Executive Misconduct in the Public Eye: A Legal Framework for Internal Investigations Triggered by Reputational Crises
After a CEO is caught on camera in a viral public incident, what should a company do? This article provides a comprehensive guide on crisis management and explores the legal response, from initiating an internal investigation to navigating reputational risk, policy violations, and executive transitions.
GENIUS Act Passes the House: A Defining Moment for U.S. Crypto Policy
Praised by SEC Chairman Paul S. Atkins in an official statement, the GENIUS Act reflects years of bipartisan effort to create a coherent legal framework for crypto asset innovation in the United States. The bill’s passage represents more than regulatory progress—it is a signal that U.S. policy is beginning to shift from enforcement-by-default to regulation-by-design.
SEC Investor Advocate Outlines FY2026 Objectives: Focus on Retail Protection, Disclosure Efficacy, and Private Market Risks
On June 25, 2025, the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Office of the Investor Advocate submitted its annual Report to Congress, outlining the Office’s key policy objectives and areas of focus for Fiscal Year 2026. As retail participation in the markets continues to rise, the Investor Advocate’s priorities reflect a broader regulatory shift toward more data-driven investor protection efforts, disclosure modernization, and a closer examination of opaque market structures—including risks tied to private market exposure in retirement accounts and China-based issuers operating through variable interest entities (VIEs).
SEC Extends Compliance Date for Daily Reserve Computation Requirements Under Rule 15c3-3
On June 25, 2025, the Securities and Exchange Commission announced an extension of the compliance deadline for broker-dealers subject to its December 2024 amendments to Rule 15c3-3—the Customer Protection Rule. The amendments require certain broker-dealers to compute reserve requirements daily rather than weekly. The new compliance deadline has been extended from December 31, 2025, to June 30, 2026, providing firms with six additional months to complete the transition.
SEC Releases Data on Broker-Dealers, M&A Activity, and Business Development Companies
On June 26, 2025, the SEC’s Division of Economic and Risk Analysis (DERA) published three detailed reports providing updated data and analysis on broker-dealers, mergers and acquisitions (M&A), and business development companies (BDCs). These reports are part of the agency’s ongoing effort to enhance transparency and provide market participants with relevant data to support regulatory and commercial decision-making.
Regulation A and the Role of Finders: A Fresh Look at an Old Dilemma
The SEC’s Small Business Capital Formation Advisory Committee will convene on July 22, 2025, to revisit two of the most important—yet perennially underdeveloped—components of the U.S. private capital markets: Regulation A and the regulatory treatment of “finders.” Both topics go to the heart of one of the SEC’s toughest policy challenges: how to responsibly expand capital access for small and emerging businesses without sacrificing investor protection.
Opinion: If the SEC calls, don’t just call “a lawyer”
When a Fortune 500 company receives an SEC subpoena, they know what to do. When a major bank is contacted by FINRA or the DOJ, they move quickly—and strategically. They don’t just call “a lawyer.” They retain people who live and breathe securities enforcement—attorneys who have either worked inside the SEC or DOJ or trained at elite law firms defending clients in high-stakes regulatory matters. But I see something different play out for smaller companies, startups, founders, and even mid-size financial firms. When they get that same letter or subpoena, they panic. They call the first lawyer they can think of—sometimes a family friend, a generalist litigator, or someone recommended by their insurance panel. And while those lawyers may be talented in other areas, they often have little or no experience with securities enforcement defense.
New Frontiers, Old Rules: SEC Staff Outlines Disclosure Expectations for Crypto Asset ETPs
On July 1, 2025, the SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance issued a comprehensive staff statement clarifying its views on disclosure obligations under the federal securities laws for issuers of crypto asset exchange-traded products (ETPs). While the products themselves represent novel financial structures—trust-based vehicles holding spot crypto or derivatives—the statement emphasizes continuity in legal obligations: crypto ETP issuers must adhere to well-established disclosure requirements under the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Tokenization Reality Check: Commissioner Peirce’s July 2025 Statement
For me and other experts who practice in this space, this was a bit of a "well duh" moment. But given the culminating momentum in the crypto space following the increasingly positive sentiment overall towards the digital assets industry, the Commission was right to make this clear. In a clear-eyed statement issued July 9, 2025, SEC Commissioner Hester M. Peirce addressed the increasing prevalence of tokenized securities, emphasizing that while the underlying technology may be novel, the applicable laws are not.
Crypto in Transition: A Regulatory Crossroads for Digital Assets, Tokenization, and ETPs
The digital asset ecosystem is entering a defining period—where legislative clarity, regulatory nuance, and litigation risk are converging. As crypto markets stabilize following years of enforcement-heavy scrutiny, U.S. regulators are offering more detailed guidance. New legislation and thoughtful statements from key regulators point toward a maturing legal environment—one that retains rigor while opening pathways for innovation. At the same time, market participants must navigate a shifting landscape marked by technological complexity, state-level litigation risks, and intensifying disclosure obligations.
This update provides a unified view of where the industry is now—from Congress and the SEC to private litigation—and what legal counsel should be preparing for next.
Regulatory Update: SEC Staff Guidance Eases Broker-Dealer Path Into Digital Asset Markets
On May 15, 2025, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Division of Trading and Markets (“Staff”) published a set of Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) offering long-awaited clarity for SEC-registered broker-dealers and transfer agents engaging in crypto asset-related activities.
Issued alongside FINRA and accompanied by the formal withdrawal of the 2019 Joint Staff Statement on Broker-Dealer Custody of Digital Asset Securities, this update is a meaningful step forward. It signals the Staff’s intent to move past defensive postures and toward practical, systems-level integration of crypto asset infrastructure into the legacy securities framework.
To be clear: the FAQs don’t alter statutory obligations or override the SEC’s 2020 Special Purpose Broker-Dealer (“SPBD”) Statement. But what they do provide is a viable, operational path for traditional broker-dealers to custody crypto asset securities—without siloed carveouts or regulatory acrobatics.
Let’s break down what matters, and why this shift should be on the radar of every compliance officer, digital asset GC, and prime services executive with an eye on the evolving intersection of finance and blockchain.
Tokens, Forwards, and the Illusion of Equity: What Republic's SpaceX Deal Tells Us About Modern Securities Innovation
Matt Levine’s latest Money Stuff column dissects a fascinating and increasingly common financial arrangement that blurs the line between traditional equity, tokenized instruments, and synthetic exposure: Republic’s tokenized forward tied to SpaceX stock.
SEC Reevaluates Controversial Market Surveillance Tool Amid Legal and Industry Pushback
In a move that signals regulatory recalibration, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has paused litigation surrounding its Consolidated Audit Trail (CAT) — a long-debated, market-wide surveillance system that has drawn growing criticism from investors, industry participants, and conservative watchdogs. The SEC’s pause suggests that the agency may be open to modifying or even scaling back one of the most ambitious trade monitoring initiatives in modern market history.
Judge Rejects SEC and Ripple’s Joint Bid to Reduce Fine and Vacate Injunction
In a striking rebuke to both a federal agency and a prominent digital asset firm, U.S. District Judge Analisa Torres has rejected a joint motion by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and Ripple Labs to finalize a reduced civil penalty and vacate a previously imposed injunction in their high-profile enforcement battle. The ruling underscores the limits of private settlement power in the face of final judicial determinations and reinforces the judiciary’s role in upholding statutory mandates — especially in cases involving violations of the federal securities laws.
Ripple and SEC Seek to Resolve Civil Penalty Dispute with $75M Release to Ripple
In a notable shift toward final resolution, Ripple Labs and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) have jointly filed a motion in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York seeking to modify the judgment in their long-standing enforcement matter and release funds held in escrow. Under the proposed stipulation, $125 million in civil penalties previously imposed on Ripple would be partially redistributed—$50 million paid to the SEC, with the remaining $75 million returned to Ripple.
DOJ Charges Amalgam Founder With Crypto Fraud: A Case Study in Deception
The Justice Department has unsealed criminal charges against Jeremy Jordan-Jones, alleged founder of the now-defunct crypto venture Amalgam, accusing him of orchestrating a $1 million investor fraud built on fabricated partnerships, fictitious technology, and the trappings of blockchain legitimacy.
The indictment is the latest in a growing string of federal enforcement actions targeting fraudulent schemes masquerading as legitimate digital asset businesses. The message from prosecutors is clear: the novelty of blockchain will not shield bad actors from traditional fraud charges.
The GENIUS Act: A Long Overdue Framework for Blockchain-Era Banking
The recent Senate vote to advance the GENIUS Act—a bipartisan bill to regulate stablecoins—is more than just another milestone in crypto policy. It represents a long-overdue recognition that fiat-backed digital dollars are not speculative assets; they are infrastructure.
At Anderson P.C., we strongly support the GENIUS Act and believe it lays the foundation for a safer, more credible, and ultimately more competitive U.S. digital economy.
Ten Legal Challenges Reshaping the Sports Industry in 2024–2025
Anderson P.C. enters this space with a unique combination of sector fluency and legal precision. We advise clients ranging from elite athletes and sports executives to institutional investors, leagues, and media partners. Our approach is rooted in a firm-wide commitment to clarity, discretion, and strategic foresight.
Announcing the Launch of Anderson P.C.'s Sports & Entertainment Practice
Anderson P.C. is pleased to announce the launch of its Sports & Entertainment Practice, marking a strategic expansion aligned with the rapidly evolving legal landscape across the global sports industry. Our practice draws upon extensive regulatory, litigation, and advisory experience, and is informed by a deep understanding of the industry from both legal and operational perspectives.