Important Announcement
We are pleased to share that as of August 1, 2025, Braeden Anderson, the founder of Anderson P.C., has joined Gesmer Updegrove LLP as a Partner. Work currently performed by Anderson P.C. will be transitioning to Gesmer. This website will remain active as a curated archive for legal insights.
Gesmer Updegrove LLP, founded in 1986, is a nationally recognized law firm with a premier reputation for representing high-growth companies, innovative technology pioneers, and venture-backed startups. Together, we are enhancing our ability to provide comprehensive, end-to-end legal support to entrepreneurs, founders, investors, and scaling businesses across every stage of the corporate lifecycle. From formation, fundraising, and IP strategy to tax planning, M&A, securities compliance, enforcement defense, and strategic exits, our combined strengths now span the full spectrum of business law.
Thank you for following and supporting us on this journey. To learn more or to connect with Braeden or a member of the Gesmer team, please visit: www.gesmer.com or e-mail him at braeden.anderson@gesmer.com
FINRA’s December Meeting: Outside Activities Reform and Emerging Legal Challenges
The December 2024 FINRA Board of Governors meeting comes at a critical juncture, as the organization seeks to modernize its regulatory frameworks while grappling with heightened scrutiny of its authority and practices. Key among the discussions was FINRA’s proposal to consolidate its Outside Business Activities (OBA) and Private Securities Transactions (PST) rules into a unified Outside Activities Requirements Rule. However, this initiative takes place against the backdrop of two significant legal challenges: the Alpine Securities Corp. v. FINRA ruling, which questioned FINRA’s expedited expulsion procedures, and the federal lawsuit Preston v. SEC, which challenges the validity of FINRA Rule 3270 governing outside activities.
FINRA Likely to Amend Expulsion Practices in Wake of D.C. Circuit Ruling
The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), the financial industry’s self-regulator, faces a turning point following a recent ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. In Alpine Securities Corp. v. FINRA, the court held that FINRA’s expedited expulsion proceedings likely exceed its authority without prior oversight from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). This decision has significant implications for FINRA’s enforcement practices and the broader broker-dealer landscape.
D.C. Circuit Issues Long-Awaited Decision in Alpine v. FINRA
On November 22, 2024, the D.C. Circuit issued a landmark decision in Alpine Securities Corporation v. FINRA, a case that examines the constitutional boundaries of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority’s (FINRA) enforcement powers. The ruling enjoined FINRA from expelling Alpine Securities Corporation without prior SEC review, emphasizing the limitations of expedited enforcement proceedings under the nondelegation doctrine.