Securities Enforcement. Corporate Investigations. Financial Regulation.
Independent analysis of the laws, regulations, investigations, and enforcement actions shaping modern financial markets.
BRAEDEN ANDERSON
Braeden is one of the top securities lawyers in the country and was recognized by Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch® in America in the Financial Services Regulation Law and Securities Regulation categories. This honor is awarded to only the top 2% of attorneys in the United States and is based on a comprehensive peer-review survey.
Braeden helped lead Gesmer Updegrove to recognition in The Legal 500 United States for Corporate Investigations & White Collar Crime, Tier 3, and Finance: Fintech, Tier 4.
Braeden is active in the U.S. securities enforcement community through Securities Docket, where he has served on the 2025 and 2026 Advisory Boards and contributed video commentary through the Weekly Update.
Braeden was named the #1 United States author in FinTech in Mondaq’s Spring 2025 Thought Leadership Awards, reflecting the national reach and influence of his writing on fintech, securities regulation, and digital asset policy.
SECURITIES LAW IN TIMES OF WAR
Geopolitical conflict creates immediate and complex disclosure obligations for public companies. Under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act, Rule 10b-5, and Item 303 of Regulation S-K, issuers must evaluate and disclose known trends and uncertainties, including the impact of war, sanctions, supply chain disruption, and cybersecurity risk, where reasonably likely to affect financial condition or results of operations. Recent SEC guidance, including its Ukraine-related comment letters, reinforces that geopolitical events must be analyzed across MD&A, risk factors, financial statements, and disclosure controls.
Is Avalanche a Security?
Avalanche sits at the center of the SEC’s evolving crypto framework, and as a securities law nerd, this is the kind of debate I genuinely enjoy. With the agency’s 2026 interpretation recognizing “digital commodities” and Ava Labs advancing a functional, infrastructure-first approach, the analysis is becoming more precise. This piece explores whether AVAX fits within securities law, how the SEC’s latest guidance reshapes the landscape, and where automation, liability, and real-world network activity still leave meaningful open questions.
Arizona v. Kalshi: Criminal Enforcement and the Next Phase of the Prediction Market Reckoning
Arizona’s criminal charges against Kalshi mark a turning point in the regulation of prediction markets, escalating the conflict between federal commodities law and state gambling regimes. This article examines the legal and structural implications of the case, including preemption, CFTC authority, and the growing tension between derivatives markets and sportsbook regulation. As prediction markets continue to expand, this enforcement action may shape the future of event-based trading in the United States.
The SEC’s New Enforcement Manual Signals a Procedural Reset in Securities Enforcement
On February 24, 2026, the SEC’s Division of Enforcement published a revised Enforcement Manual. This article is a clean-room, original discussion of the press release and the 2026 Enforcement Manual. It is also meant to sit naturally inside the enforcement “throughline” I have been building on Anderson Insights: the idea that enforcement outcomes are increasingly driven by (i) data and surveillance sophistication, (ii) procedural architecture, and (iii) the downstream consequences of resolutions, often more than the headline penalty itself.
Prediction Markets, Insider Trading, and the Return of First Principles
This piece analyzes the CFTC’s advisory confirming that prediction markets are regulated derivatives subject to anti-fraud and manipulation rules. Braeden Anderson explains how insider trading doctrines apply to event contracts and what this means for exchanges, fintech platforms, and sophisticated traders operating in evolving markets.