A man wearing a blue suit with a white shirt and a tie, with his arms crossed, smiling and standing against a plain background.

BRAEDEN ANDERSON

Welcome to Anderson Insights.

We provide authoritative analysis on securities and commodities regulation, SEC and FINRA enforcement, and legal developments affecting crypto, digital assets, fintech, and financial services, authored by Braeden Anderson.

Please enjoy our legal writings. If you want to talk anything through, send Braeden an email.

Looking for something specific?

The full Anderson Insights archive is now searchable. Use the search bar to find past content by topic, agency, or keyword. Try searching: “SEC v. Jarkesy,” “ATS regulation,” “custody” or “digital assets”

SECURITIES LAW IN TIMES OF WAR
K. Braeden Anderson K. Braeden Anderson

SECURITIES LAW IN TIMES OF WAR

Geopolitical conflict creates immediate and complex disclosure obligations for public companies. Under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act, Rule 10b-5, and Item 303 of Regulation S-K, issuers must evaluate and disclose known trends and uncertainties, including the impact of war, sanctions, supply chain disruption, and cybersecurity risk, where reasonably likely to affect financial condition or results of operations. Recent SEC guidance, including its Ukraine-related comment letters, reinforces that geopolitical events must be analyzed across MD&A, risk factors, financial statements, and disclosure controls.

Read More
Is Avalanche a Security?
K. Braeden Anderson K. Braeden Anderson

Is Avalanche a Security?

Avalanche sits at the center of the SEC’s evolving crypto framework, and as a securities law nerd, this is the kind of debate I genuinely enjoy. With the agency’s 2026 interpretation recognizing “digital commodities” and Ava Labs advancing a functional, infrastructure-first approach, the analysis is becoming more precise. This piece explores whether AVAX fits within securities law, how the SEC’s latest guidance reshapes the landscape, and where automation, liability, and real-world network activity still leave meaningful open questions.

Read More
K. Braeden Anderson K. Braeden Anderson

Arizona v. Kalshi: Criminal Enforcement and the Next Phase of the Prediction Market Reckoning

Arizona’s criminal charges against Kalshi mark a turning point in the regulation of prediction markets, escalating the conflict between federal commodities law and state gambling regimes. This article examines the legal and structural implications of the case, including preemption, CFTC authority, and the growing tension between derivatives markets and sportsbook regulation. As prediction markets continue to expand, this enforcement action may shape the future of event-based trading in the United States.

Read More
K. Braeden Anderson K. Braeden Anderson

The SEC’s New Enforcement Manual Signals a Procedural Reset in Securities Enforcement

On February 24, 2026, the SEC’s Division of Enforcement published a revised Enforcement Manual. This article is a clean-room, original discussion of the press release and the 2026 Enforcement Manual. It is also meant to sit naturally inside the enforcement “throughline” I have been building on Anderson Insights: the idea that enforcement outcomes are increasingly driven by (i) data and surveillance sophistication, (ii) procedural architecture, and (iii) the downstream consequences of resolutions, often more than the headline penalty itself.

Read More
K. Braeden Anderson K. Braeden Anderson

Prediction Markets, Insider Trading, and the Return of First Principles

This piece analyzes the CFTC’s advisory confirming that prediction markets are regulated derivatives subject to anti-fraud and manipulation rules. Braeden Anderson explains how insider trading doctrines apply to event contracts and what this means for exchanges, fintech platforms, and sophisticated traders operating in evolving markets.

Read More