Securities Enforcement. Corporate Investigations. Financial Regulation.

Independent analysis of the laws, regulations, investigations, and enforcement actions shaping modern financial markets.

BOOK A CALL
CLIENT INTAKE FORM
ABOUT ME
GESMER UPDEGROVE

BRAEDEN ANDERSON

Braeden is one of the top securities lawyers in the country and was recognized by Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch® in America in the Financial Services Regulation Law and Securities Regulation categories. This honor is awarded to only the top 2% of attorneys in the United States and is based on a comprehensive peer-review survey.

Braeden helped lead Gesmer Updegrove to recognition in The Legal 500 United States for Corporate Investigations & White Collar Crime, Tier 3, and Finance: Fintech, Tier 4.

Braeden is active in the U.S. securities enforcement community through Securities Docket, where he has served on the 2025 and 2026 Advisory Boards and contributed video commentary through the Weekly Update.

Braeden was named the #1 United States author in FinTech in Mondaq’s Spring 2025 Thought Leadership Awards, reflecting the national reach and influence of his writing on fintech, securities regulation, and digital asset policy.

Anderson Insights K. Braeden Anderson Anderson Insights K. Braeden Anderson

ICAN Petitions Court to Compel SEC Review of “Accredited Investor” Rule

The Investor Choice Advocates Network (ICAN) has filed a writ of mandamus seeking to compel the SEC to review its definition of “accredited investor,” sparking renewed debate over a long-standing rule that governs participation in private investment markets. At the heart of the issue is whether the current standard, which limits eligibility based on income or net worth, strikes the right balance between protecting investors and fostering economic growth.

Read More
SEC Regulatory Update K. Braeden Anderson SEC Regulatory Update K. Braeden Anderson

Update: The Supreme Court’s Decision in SEC v. Jarkesy and Its Broader Impact on SEC Enforcement

The Jarkesy ruling has considerable consequences for the SEC’s enforcement program. For years, the SEC has utilized its administrative forum to pursue civil penalties for securities fraud, with the flexibility to adjudicate matters in-house. However, the Supreme Court's decision effectively eliminates this option for cases seeking civil penalties. As a result, the SEC will likely need to shift more cases to federal court, where defendants are entitled to a jury trial. This shift could increase the complexity, time, and costs associated with SEC enforcement actions.

Read More