BRAEDEN ANDERSON
This work began as one lawyer writing carefully about issues he studies and practices.
It now reaches over a million readers, alongside 20,000 newsletter subscribers and 160,000 YouTube followers.
Thank you for being part of this community.
Looking for something specific?
The full Anderson Insights archive is now searchable. Use the search bar to find past content by topic, agency, or keyword. Try searching: “SEC v. Jarkesy,” “ATS regulation,” “custody” or “digital assets”
Hi, I’m Braeden.
I'm a partner at Gesmer Updegrove LLP, where I lead the Securities Regulatory and Enforcement and Digital Assets practice areas. I’ve served as Assistant General Counsel at Robinhood, practiced at Kirkland & Ellis and Sidley Austin, and represented clients in high-stakes matters before the SEC, DOJ, FINRA, and state regulators.
I write and make content for people who don’t have time to guess: founders, lawyers, regulators, and smart operators who know better than to rely on Google or the AI answer without context.
I've been recognized by U.S. Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch® for Financial Services and Securities Regulation, and listed in Marquis Who’s Who in America for contributions to law and public service.
Enjoy the content. I hope you find what you’re looking for. And if you want to talk something through, don’t hesitate to reach out. I’d love to hear from you. It’s really cool when readers become clients.
ICAN Petitions Court to Compel SEC Review of “Accredited Investor” Rule
The Investor Choice Advocates Network (ICAN) has filed a writ of mandamus seeking to compel the SEC to review its definition of “accredited investor,” sparking renewed debate over a long-standing rule that governs participation in private investment markets. At the heart of the issue is whether the current standard, which limits eligibility based on income or net worth, strikes the right balance between protecting investors and fostering economic growth.
Update: The Supreme Court’s Decision in SEC v. Jarkesy and Its Broader Impact on SEC Enforcement
The Jarkesy ruling has considerable consequences for the SEC’s enforcement program. For years, the SEC has utilized its administrative forum to pursue civil penalties for securities fraud, with the flexibility to adjudicate matters in-house. However, the Supreme Court's decision effectively eliminates this option for cases seeking civil penalties. As a result, the SEC will likely need to shift more cases to federal court, where defendants are entitled to a jury trial. This shift could increase the complexity, time, and costs associated with SEC enforcement actions.