Important Announcement

We are pleased to share that as of August 1, 2025, Braeden Anderson, the founder of Anderson P.C., has joined Gesmer Updegrove LLP as a Partner. Work currently performed by Anderson P.C. will be transitioning to Gesmer. This website will remain active as a curated archive for legal insights.

Gesmer Updegrove LLP, founded in 1986, is a nationally recognized law firm with a premier reputation for representing high-growth companies, innovative technology pioneers, and venture-backed startups. Together, we are enhancing our ability to provide comprehensive, end-to-end legal support to entrepreneurs, founders, investors, and scaling businesses across every stage of the corporate lifecycle. From formation, fundraising, and IP strategy to tax planning, M&A, securities compliance, enforcement defense, and strategic exits, our combined strengths now span the full spectrum of business law.

Thank you for following and supporting us on this journey. To learn more or to connect with Braeden or a member of the Gesmer team, please visit: www.gesmer.com or e-mail him at braeden.anderson@gesmer.com

Anderson Insights K. Braeden Anderson Anderson Insights K. Braeden Anderson

ICAN Petitions Court to Compel SEC Review of “Accredited Investor” Rule

The Investor Choice Advocates Network (ICAN) has filed a writ of mandamus seeking to compel the SEC to review its definition of “accredited investor,” sparking renewed debate over a long-standing rule that governs participation in private investment markets. At the heart of the issue is whether the current standard, which limits eligibility based on income or net worth, strikes the right balance between protecting investors and fostering economic growth.

Read More
SEC Regulatory Update K. Braeden Anderson SEC Regulatory Update K. Braeden Anderson

Update: The Supreme Court’s Decision in SEC v. Jarkesy and Its Broader Impact on SEC Enforcement

The Jarkesy ruling has considerable consequences for the SEC’s enforcement program. For years, the SEC has utilized its administrative forum to pursue civil penalties for securities fraud, with the flexibility to adjudicate matters in-house. However, the Supreme Court's decision effectively eliminates this option for cases seeking civil penalties. As a result, the SEC will likely need to shift more cases to federal court, where defendants are entitled to a jury trial. This shift could increase the complexity, time, and costs associated with SEC enforcement actions.

Read More