BRAEDEN ANDERSON
Welcome to Anderson Insights.
We provide authoritative analysis on securities and commodities regulation, SEC and FINRA enforcement, and legal developments affecting crypto, digital assets, fintech, and financial services, authored by Braeden Anderson.
Please enjoy our legal writings. If you want to talk anything through, send Braeden an email.
Looking for something specific?
The full Anderson Insights archive is now searchable. Use the search bar to find past content by topic, agency, or keyword. Try searching: “SEC v. Jarkesy,” “ATS regulation,” “custody” or “digital assets”
Referral Programs, Finders Fees, and Interval Funds: How to Grow Without Triggering Broker-Dealer or Marketing Rule Landmines
Fintech founders love referral programs for the same reason regulators are skeptical of them: incentives work.
If you are offering an interval fund direct-to-consumer (especially on a “self-distributed” model), a well-designed incentive program can become your most efficient acquisition channel. The wrong program, or the right program implemented the wrong way, can create problems fast: unregistered broker activity, improper compensated solicitation, and RIA Marketing Rule violations, often all at once.
This article is meant to help you spot the issues early, frame the choices, and understand why “just pay people for referrals” is not a clean concept in the securities world. It is not a blueprint you can copy-paste into your business. The details matter, and the compliance architecture matters even more.
SEC Says State Trust Companies Can Custody Crypto
In my recent YouTube video, I discuss how the SEC is beginning to align its custody framework for digital assets with industry practice. The SEC’s Division of Investment Management has issued a no-action letter confirming that certain state-chartered trust companies may serve as qualified custodians for digital assets and related cash equivalents under the Investment Advisers Act and the Investment Company Act.
Treasury Postpones Effective Date of Investment Adviser AML Rule; Signals Broader Reassessment of Regulatory Framework
The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (“FinCEN”) announced today its intent to postpone the effective date of its final rule imposing anti-money laundering (“AML”) and countering the financing of terrorism (“CFT”) requirements on investment advisers (the “IA AML Rule”).
SEC Exam Priorities for 2025: What They Mean for Investment Advisers
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has released its exam priorities for 2025, providing a roadmap for investment advisers to align their compliance programs with the regulator’s expectations. While the political transition under President Donald Trump may result in fewer enforcement actions than under the Biden administration, certain core priorities remain steadfast, regardless of the administration.
Heightened SEC Scrutiny: Investment Advisers' MNPI Policies Under the Microscope
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is intensifying its scrutiny of investment advisers’ compliance programs, particularly concerning policies and procedures designed to prevent the misuse of material nonpublic information (MNPI). Recent enforcement actions reveal that even well-intentioned but inadequately tailored policies can fall short of regulatory expectations, underscoring the importance of aligning compliance efforts with the unique risks of an adviser’s business activities.