BRAEDEN ANDERSON
Hi, I’m Braeden.
I'm a partner at Gesmer Updegrove LLP, where I lead the Securities Enforcement and Digital Assets practice areas. I’ve served as Assistant General Counsel at Robinhood, practiced at Kirkland & Ellis and Sidley Austin, and represented clients in high-stakes matters before the SEC, DOJ, FINRA, and state regulators.
I write and make content for people who don’t have time to guess: founders, lawyers, regulators, and smart operators who know better than to rely on Google or the AI answer without context.
I've been recognized by U.S. Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch® for Financial Services and Securities Regulation, and listed in Marquis Who’s Who in America for contributions to law and public service.
Enjoy the content. I hope you find what you’re looking for. And if you want to talk something through, don’t hesitate to reach out. I’d love to hear from you. It’s really cool when readers become clients.
MILLIONS OF IMPRESSIONS
20,000+ NEWSLETTER READERS
160,000+ SUBSCRIBERS ON YOUTUBE
Looking for something specific?
The full Anderson Insights archive is now searchable. Use the search bar to find past content by topic, agency, or keyword. Try searching: “SEC v. Jarkesy,” “ATS regulation,” “custody” or “digital assets”
U.S. Treasury’s Overreach in Crypto Broker Reporting Sparks Industry Outrage
Recent developments in Treasury’s crypto broker reporting regulations have ignited heated debate across the digital asset community. At the heart of the controversy lies a significant overreach: Treasury’s expanded definition of “broker” now includes entities like informational websites, platforms with "connect wallet" features, and other services that merely provide users with data they can use to transact on blockchain networks. This interpretation, codified in TD 10021, has drawn sharp criticism for its legal overextension and potential to stifle innovation in the burgeoning crypto sector.