A man wearing a blue suit with a white shirt and a tie, with his arms crossed, smiling and standing against a plain background.

BRAEDEN ANDERSON

Welcome to Anderson Insights.

We provide authoritative analysis on securities and commodities regulation, SEC and FINRA enforcement, and legal developments affecting crypto, digital assets, fintech, and financial services, authored by Braeden Anderson.

Please enjoy our legal writings. If you want to talk anything through, send Braeden an email.

Looking for something specific?

The full Anderson Insights archive is now searchable. Use the search bar to find past content by topic, agency, or keyword. Try searching: “SEC v. Jarkesy,” “ATS regulation,” “custody” or “digital assets”

Anderson Insights K. Braeden Anderson Anderson Insights K. Braeden Anderson

Tokenization Reality Check: Commissioner Peirce’s July 2025 Statement

For me and other experts who practice in this space, this was a bit of a "well duh" moment. But given the culminating momentum in the crypto space following the increasingly positive sentiment overall towards the digital assets industry, the Commission was right to make this clear. In a clear-eyed statement issued July 9, 2025, SEC Commissioner Hester M. Peirce addressed the increasing prevalence of tokenized securities, emphasizing that while the underlying technology may be novel, the applicable laws are not.

Read More
Anderson Insights K. Braeden Anderson Anderson Insights K. Braeden Anderson

Crypto in Transition: A Regulatory Crossroads for Digital Assets, Tokenization, and ETPs

The digital asset ecosystem is entering a defining period—where legislative clarity, regulatory nuance, and litigation risk are converging. As crypto markets stabilize following years of enforcement-heavy scrutiny, U.S. regulators are offering more detailed guidance. New legislation and thoughtful statements from key regulators point toward a maturing legal environment—one that retains rigor while opening pathways for innovation. At the same time, market participants must navigate a shifting landscape marked by technological complexity, state-level litigation risks, and intensifying disclosure obligations.

This update provides a unified view of where the industry is now—from Congress and the SEC to private litigation—and what legal counsel should be preparing for next.

Read More
Anderson Insights K. Braeden Anderson Anderson Insights K. Braeden Anderson

Regulatory Update: SEC Staff Guidance Eases Broker-Dealer Path Into Digital Asset Markets

On May 15, 2025, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Division of Trading and Markets (“Staff”) published a set of Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) offering long-awaited clarity for SEC-registered broker-dealers and transfer agents engaging in crypto asset-related activities.

Issued alongside FINRA and accompanied by the formal withdrawal of the 2019 Joint Staff Statement on Broker-Dealer Custody of Digital Asset Securities, this update is a meaningful step forward. It signals the Staff’s intent to move past defensive postures and toward practical, systems-level integration of crypto asset infrastructure into the legacy securities framework.

To be clear: the FAQs don’t alter statutory obligations or override the SEC’s 2020 Special Purpose Broker-Dealer (“SPBD”) Statement. But what they do provide is a viable, operational path for traditional broker-dealers to custody crypto asset securities—without siloed carveouts or regulatory acrobatics.

Let’s break down what matters, and why this shift should be on the radar of every compliance officer, digital asset GC, and prime services executive with an eye on the evolving intersection of finance and blockchain.

Read More
Anderson Insights K. Braeden Anderson Anderson Insights K. Braeden Anderson

SEC Reevaluates Controversial Market Surveillance Tool Amid Legal and Industry Pushback

In a move that signals regulatory recalibration, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has paused litigation surrounding its Consolidated Audit Trail (CAT) — a long-debated, market-wide surveillance system that has drawn growing criticism from investors, industry participants, and conservative watchdogs. The SEC’s pause suggests that the agency may be open to modifying or even scaling back one of the most ambitious trade monitoring initiatives in modern market history.

Read More