The Securities and Exchange Commission’s recent leadership changes may signal a recalibration in the enforcement of Advisers Act Rule 206(4)-8, a cornerstone of the SEC’s oversight of investment advisers to pooled investment vehicles. With Chairman Paul Atkins returning to the agency, the Commission’s long-standing reliance on a negligence standard could soon be revisited.

The PWG report and the SEC’s announcement of Project Crypto mark the most significant federal policy movement in digital assets to date. While the statements carry a strong political tone, the practical question for industry participants is whether these initiatives translate into binding rules and legislation. Until that occurs, regulatory uncertainty remains, but the trajectory toward a more structured framework is clearer than it has been in years.

As some of you may remember, last year the SEC adopted Final Rules under Release No. 34-99477 significantly expanding the scope of who must register as a “dealer” or “government securities dealer” under the Exchange Act. Despite the magnitude of this change, many market participants have not revisited the issue since the rules were announced. With FINRA examinations already underway for new registrants, this is the right moment to put the expanded dealer definition back on the radar.