Important Announcement
We are pleased to share that as of August 1, 2025, Braeden Anderson, the founder of Anderson P.C., has joined Gesmer Updegrove LLP as a Partner. Work currently performed by Anderson P.C. will be transitioning to Gesmer. This website will remain active as a curated archive for legal insights.
Gesmer Updegrove LLP, founded in 1986, is a nationally recognized law firm with a premier reputation for representing high-growth companies, innovative technology pioneers, and venture-backed startups. Together, we are enhancing our ability to provide comprehensive, end-to-end legal support to entrepreneurs, founders, investors, and scaling businesses across every stage of the corporate lifecycle. From formation, fundraising, and IP strategy to tax planning, M&A, securities compliance, enforcement defense, and strategic exits, our combined strengths now span the full spectrum of business law.
Thank you for following and supporting us on this journey. To learn more or to connect with Braeden or a member of the Gesmer team, please visit: www.gesmer.com or e-mail him at braeden.anderson@gesmer.com
FINRA Finalizes SLATE Rule 6540: The Definitive Guide to Securities Lending Transparency Requirements (Effective 2026)
On April 2, 2026, FINRA Rule 6540 under the new SLATE (Securities Lending and Transparency Engine) Rule 6500 Series will take effect, ushering in a new era of regulatory transparency in the securities lending market. Mandated by SEC Rule 10c-1a under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, FINRA’s new framework sets out detailed reporting and public dissemination requirements for securities loans and their modifications. These changes represent a significant expansion in regulatory oversight and transparency and will affect broker-dealers, agent lenders, institutional investors, and other market participants engaged in securities lending. This guide outlines the obligations, timeline, mechanics, legal challenges, and implications of Rule 6540 in a comprehensive manner, providing all the information market participants need to comply and strategize under the new regime.
SEC Investor Advocate Outlines FY2026 Objectives: Focus on Retail Protection, Disclosure Efficacy, and Private Market Risks
On June 25, 2025, the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Office of the Investor Advocate submitted its annual Report to Congress, outlining the Office’s key policy objectives and areas of focus for Fiscal Year 2026. As retail participation in the markets continues to rise, the Investor Advocate’s priorities reflect a broader regulatory shift toward more data-driven investor protection efforts, disclosure modernization, and a closer examination of opaque market structures—including risks tied to private market exposure in retirement accounts and China-based issuers operating through variable interest entities (VIEs).
Crypto Advocates Celebrate as Caroline Crenshaw’s Renomination Vote is Canceled
In a notable development for the cryptocurrency industry, the Senate Banking Committee has canceled its vote on the renomination of SEC Commissioner Caroline Crenshaw. Originally scheduled for Wednesday, the vote was postponed due to a procedural conflict, according to a report by FOX Business journalist Eleanor Terrett. With Congress set to adjourn on December 20, this delay ensures that Crenshaw’s renomination will not be processed in time, leaving her future on the Commission uncertain.
Crypto Groups Push Back Against Crenshaw Nomination: How Much Power Can One Commissioner Wield?
The nomination of U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) member Caroline Crenshaw is sparking fierce resistance from the crypto industry. Dubbed “even more extreme” than SEC Chair Gary Gensler by critics, Crenshaw’s reappointment is being targeted through digital ad campaigns and lobbying efforts. The Cedar Innovation Foundation, a dark-money group backed by unnamed crypto interests, has taken center stage in this opposition, citing her consistent criticism of digital assets and reluctance to approve spot bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs).
The Impact of Technology on Securities Markets: A Legal Perspective on the SEC’s Report
The SEC’s recent report to Congress on the impact of technological advances in securities markets isn’t merely a catalog of tech developments; it’s an inventory of how these tools alter the market’s fundamental mechanics—and, yes, its regulatory challenges. If the 20th century markets were defined by floor traders, telephone orders, and paper filings, the 21st century has swiftly evolved into a digital arena dominated by algorithms, blockchain, and AI. The upshot? We’re witnessing a market that’s faster, more accessible, and potentially more transparent, but also laden with new regulatory wrinkles. Let’s examine what the SEC has to say about this digital transformation and its implications for legal compliance, investor protection, and, well, market stability.