Securities Enforcement. Corporate Investigations. Financial Regulation.
Independent analysis of the laws, regulations, investigations, and enforcement actions shaping modern financial markets.
BRAEDEN ANDERSON
Braeden is one of the top securities lawyers in the country and was recognized by Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch® in America in the Financial Services Regulation Law and Securities Regulation categories. This honor is awarded to only the top 2% of attorneys in the United States and is based on a comprehensive peer-review survey.
Braeden helped lead Gesmer Updegrove to recognition in The Legal 500 United States for Corporate Investigations & White Collar Crime, Tier 3, and Finance: Fintech, Tier 4.
Braeden is active in the U.S. securities enforcement community through Securities Docket, where he has served on the 2025 and 2026 Advisory Boards and contributed video commentary through the Weekly Update.
Braeden was named the #1 United States author in FinTech in Mondaq’s Spring 2025 Thought Leadership Awards, reflecting the national reach and influence of his writing on fintech, securities regulation, and digital asset policy.
The SEC’s New Enforcement Manual Signals a Procedural Reset in Securities Enforcement
On February 24, 2026, the SEC’s Division of Enforcement published a revised Enforcement Manual. This article is a clean-room, original discussion of the press release and the 2026 Enforcement Manual. It is also meant to sit naturally inside the enforcement “throughline” I have been building on Anderson Insights: the idea that enforcement outcomes are increasingly driven by (i) data and surveillance sophistication, (ii) procedural architecture, and (iii) the downstream consequences of resolutions, often more than the headline penalty itself.
Regulatory Update: SEC Staff Guidance Eases Broker-Dealer Path Into Digital Asset Markets
On May 15, 2025, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Division of Trading and Markets (“Staff”) published a set of Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) offering long-awaited clarity for SEC-registered broker-dealers and transfer agents engaging in crypto asset-related activities.
Issued alongside FINRA and accompanied by the formal withdrawal of the 2019 Joint Staff Statement on Broker-Dealer Custody of Digital Asset Securities, this update is a meaningful step forward. It signals the Staff’s intent to move past defensive postures and toward practical, systems-level integration of crypto asset infrastructure into the legacy securities framework.
To be clear: the FAQs don’t alter statutory obligations or override the SEC’s 2020 Special Purpose Broker-Dealer (“SPBD”) Statement. But what they do provide is a viable, operational path for traditional broker-dealers to custody crypto asset securities—without siloed carveouts or regulatory acrobatics.
Let’s break down what matters, and why this shift should be on the radar of every compliance officer, digital asset GC, and prime services executive with an eye on the evolving intersection of finance and blockchain.